Does size really matter?

Does size really matter?

By David Verveer

I just read a shocking article about a research of British scientists, who measured size of ice bear sculls and discovered that during the last hundred years, the sculls show shrinkage, which those researches blamed on the global heating, as the modern day ice bear has difficulty in finding fodder, which in my opinion is a rather illogical conclusion, as with warmer climate and less ice, the available fodder and grazing grounds increase instead of decrease, but scientists are allowed to blame everything on the climate change,

Which remind me of another research, conducted by a lady scientist, who started her adult life as call girl, and became rather famous because her famous clients and political implications, when her list of clientele was published in one of the leading newspapers. This lady (and I will not mention her name), when her fame died, commenced into a new page of her life, and enrolled university, studying sexual behavior of males. She is now in her early eighties and recently published a study claiming that the male genitalia seems to have shrunk through the years, however instead of the former item, she doesn't blame the climate change or global warming, but the reduction in sexual drive of the male sex partner. A fellow researcher, going over those conclusions, suggest to consider that those changes in dimensions of the male parts, might be caused by exaggerating mental memories of the researcher lady, and happy memories of the past.

Could not find a suitable illustration for this post